Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs IWD: how they differ

DYNF and IWD hold 40% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and IWD hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and IWD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFIWD
Apple Inc7.75%5.38%
Amazon.com Inc4.42%5.95%
Microsoft Corp5.35%3.89%
JPMorgan Chase & Co3.59%2.46%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc2.38%2.62%
Johnson & Johnson1.92%1.72%
Exxon Mobil Corp1.93%1.60%
Cisco Systems Inc2.76%1.30%
Walmart Inc1.42%1.28%
Bank of America Corp1.59%0.99%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The1.21%0.82%
RTX Corp0.85%0.72%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in IWD
NVIDIA Corp 8.62%MERCK & CO., INC. 0.89%
Broadcom Inc 3.25%CHEVRON CORPORATION 0.86%
Alphabet Inc 2.87%THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 0.79%
Lam Research Corp 2.71%LINDE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.67%
Alphabet Inc 2.10%QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 0.55%
Tesla Inc 1.74%ANALOG DEVICES, INC. 0.51%
Applied Materials Inc 1.41%Pepsico, Inc. 0.46%
Micron Technology Inc 1.35%ABBOTT LABORATORIES 0.44%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DYNF and IWD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveRussell 1000 value
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+27.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts+9.9 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.18%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%90.2%
Holdings187870

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

IWD in plain words

IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or IWD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and IWD returned +27.4%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or IWD?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and IWD charges 0.18%, so IWD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and IWD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 90% of IWD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 40% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against IWD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against IWD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-IWD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources