Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs IJH: how they differ

DYNF and IJH hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and IJH hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and IJH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFIJH
Penumbra Inc0.14%0.34%
ATI Inc0.06%0.74%
Woodward Inc0.06%0.70%
Carpenter Technology Corp0.04%0.85%
Omega Healthcare Investors Inc0.03%0.39%
MasTec Inc0.03%0.71%
Halozyme Therapeutics Inc0.03%0.26%
RBC Bearings Inc0.03%0.56%
CACI International Inc0.02%0.28%
Planet Fitness Inc0.02%0.11%
API Group Corp0.02%0.45%
Exelixis Inc0.02%0.38%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in IJH
NVIDIA Corp 8.62%TWILIO INC 0.86%
Apple Inc 7.75%MKS INC 0.83%
Microsoft Corp 5.35%CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77%
Amazon.com Inc 4.42%ENTEGRIS INC 0.76%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59%NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%
Broadcom Inc 3.25%ILLUMINA INC 0.73%
Alphabet Inc 2.87%TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.73%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.76%STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC 0.71%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DYNF and IJH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveS&P MidCap 400
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+13.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts−4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%0.0%
Holdings187400

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or IJH?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and IJH returned +13.4%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or IJH?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and IJH charges 0.05%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and IJH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 0% of IJH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against IJH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against IJH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-IJH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources