Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs GRNY: how they differ

DYNF and GRNY hold 31% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and GRNY hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and GRNY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFGRNY
Amazon.com Inc4.42%3.02%
Broadcom Inc3.25%2.94%
Alphabet Inc2.87%2.96%
NVIDIA Corp8.62%2.46%
Apple Inc7.75%2.40%
Microsoft Corp5.35%2.38%
JPMorgan Chase & Co3.59%2.33%
Meta Platforms Inc2.50%2.24%
Tesla Inc1.74%2.15%
Caterpillar Inc1.28%2.69%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The1.21%2.27%
Netflix Inc1.17%2.82%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in GRNY
Cisco Systems Inc 2.76%Quanta Services Inc 3.20%
Lam Research Corp 2.71%Strategy Inc 3.01%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.38%Arista Networks Inc 2.88%
Alphabet Inc 2.10%KLA Corp 2.75%
Exxon Mobil Corp 1.93%Bank of New York Mellon Corp/T 2.59%
Johnson & Johnson 1.92%Eaton Corp PLC 2.56%
Duke Energy Corp 1.63%Cadence Design Systems Inc 2.54%
Bank of America Corp 1.59%ONEOK Inc 2.49%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

DYNF and GRNY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesFundstrat
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveFundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.75%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%97.0%
Holdings18740

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or GRNY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and GRNY returned +13.8%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or GRNY?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and GRNY charges 0.75%, so DYNF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and GRNY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 97% of GRNY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 31% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against GRNY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against GRNY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-GRNY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources