Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DVY vs NOBL: how they differ
DVY and NOBL hold 16% of their weight in the same names, and DVY returned more over the year.
iShares Select Dividend ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DVY and NOBL hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DVY | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| T. ROWE PRICE GROUP INC | 2.03% | 1.55% |
| KIMBERLY CLARK CORP | 1.52% | 1.49% |
| TARGET CORP | 1.45% | 1.41% |
| CHEVRON CORP | 1.38% | 1.44% |
| EVERSOURCE ENERGY | 1.38% | 1.50% |
| ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY | 1.17% | 1.68% |
| GENUINE PARTS COMPANY | 1.15% | 1.26% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORP | 0.99% | 1.44% |
| NEXTERA ENERGY INC | 0.98% | 1.41% |
| COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) | 0.92% | 1.55% |
| FRANKLIN RESOURCES INC | 0.84% | 1.67% |
| INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP | 0.83% | 1.71% |
| Only in DVY | Only in NOBL |
|---|---|
| ALTRIA GROUP INC 2.30% | Nucor Corp. 1.77% |
| PFIZER INC 2.22% | West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 1.73% |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 1.85% | Colgate-Palmolive Co. 1.62% |
| PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC 1.85% | Caterpillar, Inc. 1.61% |
| ONEOK INC 1.84% | Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 1.61% |
| HP INC 1.61% | Hormel Foods Corp. 1.61% |
| EDISON INTERNATIONAL 1.54% | JM Smucker Co. (The) 1.58% |
| LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES NV 1.53% | Essex Property Trust, Inc. 1.58% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| DVY iShares Select Dividend ETF | NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | ProShares |
| What it is | US dividend | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.0% | +9.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.5 pts | −8.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.38% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 80.5% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 100 | 69 |
DVY in plain words
DVY is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 18.3%.
NOBL in plain words
NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DVY or NOBL?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DVY returned +18.0% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so DVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DVY or NOBL?
- DVY charges 0.38% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so NOBL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DVY and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 80% of DVY and 100% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 16% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DVY against NOBL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DVY-NOBL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources