Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DIA vs SCHX: how they differ
DIA and SCHX are both equity index funds, and over the year SCHX returned more, +16.8% against +15.6%.
SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.
| DIA SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | Schwab |
| What it is | Dow Jones Industrial Average | U.S. Large-Cap |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.6% | +16.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −1.9 pts | −0.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.03% |
| Holdings | not filed | 748 |
DIA in plain words
DIA is an index equity fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 5, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SCHX in plain words
SCHX is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 748 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DIA or SCHX?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DIA returned +15.6% and SCHX returned +16.8%, so SCHX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DIA against SCHX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DIA-SCHX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources