Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DIA vs SCHB: how they differ

DIA and SCHB are both equity index funds, and over the year SCHB returned more, +17.2% against +15.6%.

SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF.

DIA and SCHB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DIA
SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetSchwab
What it isDow Jones Industrial AverageUS broad market, book from ITOT
Total return, 1 year+15.6%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−1.9 pts−0.3 pts

DIA in plain words

DIA is an index equity fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 5, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SCHB in plain words

SCHB is an index equity fund tracking the US broad market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DIA or SCHB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DIA returned +15.6% and SCHB returned +17.2%, so SCHB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DIA against SCHB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DIA against SCHB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DIA-SCHB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources