Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DIA vs MAGS: how they differ

DIA and MAGS are both equity index funds, and over the year DIA returned more, +15.6% against +14.4%.

SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

DIA and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DIA
SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetRoundhill
What it isDow Jones Industrial AverageMagnificent Seven
Total return, 1 year+15.6%+14.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−1.9 pts−3.1 pts
Expense rationot published0.30%
Holdingsnot filed9

DIA in plain words

DIA is an index equity fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 5, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MAGS in plain words

MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DIA or MAGS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DIA returned +15.6% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so DIA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DIA against MAGS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DIA against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DIA-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources