Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DIA vs IWC: how they differ

DIA and IWC are both equity index funds, and over the year IWC returned more, +31.3% against +15.6%.

SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust and iShares Micro-Cap ETF.

DIA and IWC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DIA
SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
IWC
iShares Micro-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetiShares
What it isDow Jones Industrial AverageRussell Microcap
Total return, 1 year+15.6%+31.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−1.9 pts+13.8 pts

DIA in plain words

DIA is an index equity fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 5, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IWC in plain words

IWC is an index equity fund tracking the Russell Microcap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DIA or IWC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DIA returned +15.6% and IWC returned +31.3%, so IWC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DIA against IWC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DIA against IWC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DIA-IWC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources