Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DIA vs IGIB: how they differ
DIA is an equity index fund and IGIB a bond index fund, and over the year DIA returned more, +15.6% against −1.0%.
SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust and iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.
| DIA SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | IGIB iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | iShares |
| What it is | Dow Jones Industrial Average | 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.6% | −1.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −1.9 pts | −18.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.04% |
| Holdings | not filed | 2988 |
DIA in plain words
DIA is an index equity fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 5, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IGIB in plain words
IGIB is a bond fund tracking the 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DIA or IGIB?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DIA returned +15.6% and IGIB returned −1.0%, so DIA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DIA against IGIB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DIA-IGIB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources