Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DIA vs EFA: how they differ
DIA and EFA are both equity index funds, and over the year EFA returned more, +18.2% against +15.6%.
SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF.
| DIA SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | iShares |
| What it is | Dow Jones Industrial Average | Developed markets ex US |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.6% | +18.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −1.9 pts | +0.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.32% |
| Holdings | not filed | 705 |
DIA in plain words
DIA is an index equity fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 5, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
EFA in plain words
EFA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 705 positions, with the top ten at 13.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DIA or EFA?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DIA returned +15.6% and EFA returned +18.2%, so EFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DIA against EFA, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DIA-EFA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources