Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs XLV: how they differ

DGRW and XLV hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and XLV returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and XLV hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and XLV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWXLV
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC2.92%6.59%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON2.34%10.67%
ABBVIE INC2.07%7.76%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY1.53%16.56%
GILEAD SCIENCES INC1.25%2.74%
MERCK & COMPANY INC1.18%5.54%
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS INC0.55%1.09%
STRYKER CORP0.38%1.90%
MCKESSON CORP0.36%1.59%
ZOETIS INC0.16%0.53%
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC0.04%0.66%
RESMED INC0.02%0.49%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in XLV
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%Amgen Inc 3.41%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 3.25%
APPLE INC 3.87%Abbott Laboratories 2.76%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%Intuitive Surgical Inc 2.46%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%Pfizer Inc 2.40%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%CVS Health Corp 2.30%
BROADCOM INC 2.34%Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc 2.20%
ORACLE CORP 2.34%Danaher Corp 2.10%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

DGRW and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
XLV
State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeState Street
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthHealth care
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+20.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts+2.9 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%100.0%
Holdings19759

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

XLV in plain words

XLV is an index equity fund tracking the Health care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 59 positions, with the top ten at 61.7%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or XLV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and XLV returned +20.4%, so XLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or XLV?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so XLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and XLV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 100% of XLV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against XLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against XLV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-XLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources