Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs XLP: how they differ

DGRW and XLP hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and DGRW returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and XLP hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and XLP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWXLP
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE)2.88%6.87%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE)1.40%7.46%
WALMART INC0.94%10.84%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP0.84%9.06%
SYSCO CORP0.33%2.60%
HERSHEY COMPANY (THE)0.21%1.69%
CASEY'S GENERAL STORES INC0.03%1.91%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in XLP
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%Philip Morris International Inc 6.16%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%Colgate-Palmolive Co 4.71%
APPLE INC 3.87%Altria Group Inc 4.55%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%Monster Beverage Corp 4.47%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%PepsiCo Inc 4.34%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%Mondelez International Inc 4.17%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%Target Corp 3.87%
BROADCOM INC 2.34%Keurig Dr Pepper Inc 2.90%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

DGRW and XLP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
XLP
State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeState Street
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthConsumer staples
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+6.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts−11.2 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%100.0%
Holdings19734

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

XLP in plain words

XLP is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 34 positions, with the top ten at 62.6%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or XLP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and XLP returned +6.3%, so DGRW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or XLP?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and XLP charges 0.08%, so XLP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and XLP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 100% of XLP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against XLP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against XLP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-XLP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources