Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs XLC: how they differ

DGRW and XLC hold 11% of their weight in the same names, and DGRW returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and XLC hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and XLC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWXLC
META PLATFORMS INC2.97%19.93%
ALPHABET INC2.32%10.44%
ALPHABET INC2.31%13.10%
T-MOBILE US INC1.48%4.16%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC1.15%4.15%
AT&T INC0.79%4.10%
TKO GROUP HOLDINGS INC0.01%1.53%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in XLC
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%Take-Two Interactive Software Inc 5.26%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%Netflix Inc 4.84%
APPLE INC 3.87%Comcast Corp 4.71%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%Warner Bros Discovery Inc 4.67%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%Electronic Arts Inc 4.64%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%Walt Disney Co/The 4.49%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%Live Nation Entertainment Inc 3.50%
BROADCOM INC 2.34%Omnicom Group Inc 2.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

DGRW and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
XLC
State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeState Street
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthCommunication services
Total return, 1 year+12.4%−2.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts−19.5 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%100.0%
Holdings19723

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

XLC in plain words

XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 76.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or XLC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and XLC returned −2.0%, so DGRW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or XLC?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so XLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against XLC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against XLC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-XLC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources