Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs XLB: how they differ

DGRW and XLB hold 3% of their weight in the same names.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and XLB hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and XLB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWXLB
NEWMONT CORP0.71%5.85%
SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY (THE)0.54%4.95%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC0.45%5.31%
ECOLAB INC0.41%4.73%
STEEL DYNAMICS INC0.26%3.73%
PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICA0.17%2.83%
CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS INC0.14%2.23%
VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY0.04%4.72%
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC0.03%4.55%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in XLB
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%Linde PLC 14.08%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%Corteva Inc 4.97%
APPLE INC 3.87%CRH PLC 4.67%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%Air Products and Chemicals Inc 4.63%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%Nucor Corp 3.88%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%PPG Industries Inc 3.62%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%Smurfit Westrock PLC 3.25%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%International Flavors & Fragrances Inc 2.71%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

DGRW and XLB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
XLB
State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeState Street
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthMaterials
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%100.0%
Holdings19726

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

XLB in plain words

XLB is an index equity fund tracking the Materials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 26 positions, with the top ten at 58.5%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 26, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or XLB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and XLB returned +12.0%, so DGRW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or XLB?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and XLB charges 0.08%, so XLB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and XLB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 100% of XLB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against XLB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against XLB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-XLB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources