Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs XHB: how they differ

DGRW and XHB hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and DGRW returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and XHB hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and XHB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWXHB
HOME DEPOT INC (THE)2.81%3.28%
D.R. HORTON INC0.37%3.29%
WILLIAMS SONOMA INC0.23%3.34%
PULTEGROUP INC0.21%3.44%
TOLL BROTHERS INC0.13%3.52%
CARLISLE COMPANIES INC0.12%3.28%
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC0.06%3.37%
MERITAGE HOMES CORP0.04%3.53%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in XHB
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%Owens Corning 4.10%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%Advanced Drainage Systems Inc 3.60%
APPLE INC 3.87%KB Home 3.56%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%Builders FirstSource Inc 3.56%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%Installed Building Products Inc 3.49%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%Masco Corp 3.41%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%Somnigroup International Inc 3.40%
BROADCOM INC 2.34%Champion Homes Inc 3.34%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

DGRW and XHB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
XHB
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeState Street
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthSPDR S&P Homebuilders
Total return, 1 year+12.4%−16.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts−34.1 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%45.7%
Holdings19735

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

XHB in plain words

XHB is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Homebuilders. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 46% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 35 positions, with the top ten at 35.6%. It sat 20.6% below its high of Oct 18, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or XHB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and XHB returned −16.6%, so DGRW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or XHB?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and XHB charges 0.35%, so DGRW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and XHB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 46% of XHB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against XHB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against XHB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-XHB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources