Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs VOOG: how they differ

DGRW and VOOG hold 42% of their weight in the same names, and VOOG returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and VOOG hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and VOOG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWVOOG
NVIDIA CORP7.95%14.29%
MICROSOFT CORP5.75%9.31%
APPLE INC3.87%6.38%
META PLATFORMS INC2.97%3.85%
BROADCOM INC2.34%5.90%
ALPHABET INC2.32%4.90%
ALPHABET INC2.31%6.17%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY1.53%2.44%
CATERPILLAR INC1.80%1.14%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC1.71%0.99%
LAM RESEARCH CORP0.90%1.11%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON2.34%0.89%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in VOOG
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%Amazon.com Inc 3.90%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%Micron Technology Inc 3.04%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.59%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.42%
T-MOBILE US INC 1.48%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.34%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 1.40%Tesla Inc 2.12%
CHEVRON CORP 1.38%JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.43%
MERCK & COMPANY INC 1.18%Netflix Inc 1.01%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 1.15%Palantir Technologies Inc 1.00%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

DGRW and VOOG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeVanguard
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthS&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+17.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts+0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%100.0%
Holdings197146

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

VOOG in plain words

VOOG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or VOOG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and VOOG returned +17.8%, so VOOG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or VOOG?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and VOOG charges 0.05%, so VOOG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and VOOG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 100% of VOOG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 42% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against VOOG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against VOOG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-VOOG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources