Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs VO: how they differ

DGRW and VO hold 10% of their weight in the same names.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and VO hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and VO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWVO
CUMMINS INC0.78%0.95%
PACCAR INC0.49%0.61%
NEWMONT CORP0.71%0.48%
DELTA AIR LINES INC0.46%0.57%
FORD MOTOR CO0.44%0.53%
D.R. HORTON INC0.37%0.40%
SYSCO CORP0.33%0.39%
FEDEX CORP0.60%0.33%
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS INC0.55%0.31%
FIFTH THIRD BANCORP0.30%0.50%
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC0.28%0.45%
UNITED RENTALS INC0.28%0.69%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in VO
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%Western Digital Corp 1.07%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05%
APPLE INC 3.87%Quanta Services Inc 1.05%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%Datadog Inc 0.84%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%Bloom Energy Corp 0.79%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%Robinhood Markets Inc 0.77%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%Cloudflare Inc 0.76%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%Coherent Corp 0.75%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

DGRW and VO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeVanguard
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthMid-Cap
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%91.4%
Holdings197282

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

VO in plain words

VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or VO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and VO returned +12.0%, so DGRW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or VO?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and VO charges 0.03%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and VO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 91% of VO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against VO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against VO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-VO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources