Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs VLUE: how they differ

DGRW and VLUE hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and VLUE hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and VLUE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWVLUE
APPLIED MATERIALS INC1.71%3.67%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC1.44%4.97%
MERCK & COMPANY INC1.18%1.57%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC1.15%2.66%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP0.99%1.88%
AT&T INC0.79%2.53%
QUALCOMM INC0.76%1.80%
CSX CORP0.69%0.64%
NEWMONT CORP0.71%0.64%
FEDEX CORP0.60%1.69%
PACCAR INC0.49%0.91%
FORD MOTOR CO0.44%1.50%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in VLUE
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 11.63%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%INTEL CORPORATION 9.29%
APPLE INC 3.87%GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY 3.16%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%CITIGROUP INC. 1.94%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION 1.89%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%COMCAST CORPORATION 1.50%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%PFIZER INC. 1.49%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY 1.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRW and VLUE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeiShares
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthMSCI USA Value Factor
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+69.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts+51.9 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%96.9%
Holdings197148

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

VLUE in plain words

VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or VLUE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or VLUE?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so VLUE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against VLUE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against VLUE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-VLUE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources