Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs VDE: how they differ

DGRW and VDE hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and VDE returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and Vanguard Energy Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and VDE hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and VDE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWVDE
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP1.59%21.37%
CHEVRON CORP1.38%14.53%
HALLIBURTON COMPANY0.84%1.41%
CONOCOPHILLIPS0.12%5.79%
VALERO ENERGY CORP0.07%3.19%
MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP0.07%3.29%
EOG RESOURCES INC0.06%3.06%
PHILLIPS 660.06%2.98%
TARGA RESOURCES CORP0.05%2.31%
DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC0.04%1.52%
DEVON ENERGY CORP0.04%2.12%
EQT CORP0.03%1.45%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in VDE
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%Williams Cos Inc/The 3.65%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%SLB Ltd 3.49%
APPLE INC 3.87%Baker Hughes Co 2.65%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%Kinder Morgan Inc 2.61%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%ONEOK Inc 2.22%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%Cheniere Energy Inc 2.07%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%Occidental Petroleum Corp 1.58%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%TechnipFMC PLC 1.23%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

DGRW and VDE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
VDE
Vanguard Energy Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeVanguard
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthEnergy
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+50.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts+33.1 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%81.6%
Holdings197105

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

VDE in plain words

VDE is an index equity fund tracking the Energy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +50.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 82% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 64.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or VDE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and VDE returned +50.6%, so VDE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or VDE?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and VDE charges 0.09%, so VDE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and VDE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 82% of VDE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against VDE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against VDE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-VDE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources