Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DGRW vs VBR: how they differ
DGRW and VBR hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and VBR returned more over the year.
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and VBR hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DGRW | VBR |
|---|---|---|
| STEEL DYNAMICS INC | 0.26% | 0.34% |
| WILLIAMS SONOMA INC | 0.23% | 0.59% |
| J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT SERVICES INC | 0.21% | 0.47% |
| FIRST CITIZENS BANCSHARES INC | 0.19% | 0.33% |
| CH ROBINSON WORLDWIDE INC | 0.18% | 0.45% |
| RELIANCE INC | 0.15% | 0.41% |
| CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS INC | 0.14% | 0.36% |
| WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC | 0.13% | 0.36% |
| TOLL BROTHERS INC | 0.13% | 0.34% |
| CARLISLE COMPANIES INC | 0.12% | 0.32% |
| ARAMARK | 0.12% | 0.32% |
| DICKS SPORTING GOODS INC | 0.11% | 0.30% |
| Only in DGRW | Only in VBR |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 7.95% | Jabil Inc 0.87% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.75% | Atmos Energy Corp 0.62% |
| APPLE INC 3.87% | Moderna Inc 0.54% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 2.97% | Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92% | F5 Inc 0.50% |
| COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88% | US Foods Holding Corp 0.48% |
| HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81% | Omnicom Group Inc 0.45% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34% | TD SYNNEX Corp 0.41% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | WisdomTree | Vanguard |
| What it is | U.S. Quality Dividend Growth | Small-Cap Value |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.4% | +16.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −5.1 pts | −1.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.05% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 96.7% | 30.5% |
| Holdings | 197 | 840 |
DGRW in plain words
DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.
VBR in plain words
VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or VBR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and VBR returned +16.3%, so VBR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or VBR?
- DGRW charges 0.28% a year and VBR charges 0.05%, so VBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DGRW and VBR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 30% of VBR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against VBR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-VBR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources