Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs VB: how they differ

DGRW and VB hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and VB returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and VB hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and VB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWVB
WILLIAMS SONOMA INC0.23%0.33%
J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT SERVICES INC0.21%0.27%
STEEL DYNAMICS INC0.26%0.19%
FIRST CITIZENS BANCSHARES INC0.19%0.19%
CH ROBINSON WORLDWIDE INC0.18%0.26%
RELIANCE INC0.15%0.23%
CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS INC0.14%0.20%
WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC0.13%0.20%
TOLL BROTHERS INC0.13%0.19%
CARLISLE COMPANIES INC0.12%0.18%
ARAMARK0.12%0.18%
DICKS SPORTING GOODS INC0.11%0.17%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in VB
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%Jabil Inc 0.49%
APPLE INC 3.87%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%Astera Labs Inc 0.45%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%Natera Inc 0.45%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%Twilio Inc 0.38%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%MKS Instruments Inc 0.37%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

DGRW and VB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeVanguard
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthSmall-Cap
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+15.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts−2.3 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%21.7%
Holdings1971311

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or VB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and VB returned +15.2%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or VB?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against VB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against VB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-VB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources