Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DGRW vs USMV: how they differ
DGRW and USMV hold 30% of their weight in the same names, and DGRW returned more over the year.
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and USMV hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DGRW | USMV |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 7.95% | 1.64% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 1.59% | 1.60% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 5.75% | 1.56% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 1.44% | 1.81% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 2.34% | 1.44% |
| MCDONALD'S CORP | 1.57% | 1.25% |
| COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) | 2.88% | 1.20% |
| MERCK & COMPANY INC | 1.18% | 1.18% |
| T-MOBILE US INC | 1.48% | 1.17% |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC | 1.15% | 1.49% |
| INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP | 1.59% | 1.11% |
| PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) | 1.40% | 1.11% |
| Only in DGRW | Only in USMV |
|---|---|
| ALPHABET INC 2.31% | DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 1.55% |
| CATERPILLAR INC 1.80% | THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.53% |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP 0.99% | Chubb Limited 1.50% |
| CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (THE) 0.95% | WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. 1.48% |
| LAM RESEARCH CORP 0.90% | MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. 1.46% |
| AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY 0.89% | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.42% |
| HALLIBURTON COMPANY 0.84% | VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED 1.36% |
| CUMMINS INC 0.78% | CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. 1.35% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | WisdomTree | iShares |
| What it is | U.S. Quality Dividend Growth | MSCI USA Min Vol Factor |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.4% | +6.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −5.1 pts | −10.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 96.7% | 94.8% |
| Holdings | 197 | 170 |
DGRW in plain words
DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.
USMV in plain words
USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or USMV?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and USMV returned +6.6%, so DGRW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or USMV?
- DGRW charges 0.28% a year and USMV charges 0.15%, so USMV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DGRW and USMV overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 95% of USMV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 30% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against USMV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-USMV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources