Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs SPYD: how they differ

DGRW and SPYD hold 4% of their weight in the same names.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and SPYD hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and SPYD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWSPYD
CHEVRON CORP1.38%1.20%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC1.15%1.30%
AT&T INC0.79%1.06%
FORD MOTOR CO0.44%1.21%
FIFTH THIRD BANCORP0.30%1.28%
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INC0.27%1.14%
EOG RESOURCES INC0.06%1.44%
PHILLIPS 660.06%1.44%
APA CORP0.01%1.48%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in SPYD
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%Iron Mountain Inc 1.62%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%Franklin Resources Inc 1.57%
APPLE INC 3.87%CVS Health Corp 1.53%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%Host Hotels & Resorts Inc 1.53%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%Edison International 1.48%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%Target Corp 1.48%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%Viatris Inc 1.46%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%Kimco Realty Corp 1.46%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

DGRW and SPYD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
SPYD
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeState Street
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+12.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts−4.6 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%100.0%
Holdings19778

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

SPYD in plain words

SPYD is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 15.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or SPYD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and SPYD returned +12.9%, so SPYD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or SPYD?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and SPYD charges 0.07%, so SPYD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and SPYD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 100% of SPYD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against SPYD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against SPYD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-SPYD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources