Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs SCHG: how they differ

DGRW and SCHG hold 39% of their weight in the same names.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and SCHG hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and SCHG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWSCHG
NVIDIA CORP7.95%11.02%
MICROSOFT CORP5.75%7.18%
APPLE INC3.87%9.84%
META PLATFORMS INC2.97%3.46%
BROADCOM INC2.34%4.55%
ALPHABET INC2.32%3.78%
ALPHABET INC2.31%4.76%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY1.53%3.06%
VISA INC1.41%1.92%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC2.92%1.20%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP0.84%1.48%
GE AEROSPACE0.63%1.19%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in SCHG
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%Amazon.com Inc 5.68%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%Tesla Inc 3.92%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.94%
ORACLE CORP 2.34%Netflix Inc 1.27%
ABBVIE INC 2.07%Palantir Technologies Inc 1.25%
CATERPILLAR INC 1.80%GE Vernova Inc 0.91%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 1.71%Linde PLC 0.81%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.59%Palo Alto Networks Inc 0.80%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

DGRW and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeSchwab
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthU.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+12.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts−4.8 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%95.4%
Holdings197193

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or SCHG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so SCHG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or SCHG?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 39% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against SCHG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources