Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs SCHD: how they differ

DGRW and SCHD hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and SCHD returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and SCHD hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and SCHD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWSCHD
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC2.92%5.10%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE)2.88%3.96%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE)2.81%3.37%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE)1.40%3.55%
CHEVRON CORP1.38%3.84%
MERCK & COMPANY INC1.18%3.87%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC1.15%3.66%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC0.98%5.92%
QUALCOMM INC0.76%6.75%
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC0.71%2.25%
FORD MOTOR CO0.44%1.72%
FIFTH THIRD BANCORP0.30%1.13%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in SCHD
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%Amgen Inc 3.48%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%PepsiCo Inc 3.45%
APPLE INC 3.87%Abbott Laboratories 2.97%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%Altria Group Inc 2.94%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.94%
BROADCOM INC 2.34%Accenture PLC 2.90%
ORACLE CORP 2.34%Lockheed Martin Corp 2.71%
ALPHABET INC 2.32%Comcast Corp 2.25%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

DGRW and SCHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeSchwab
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthUS dividend
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+27.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts+10.1 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%95.1%
Holdings19799

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

SCHD in plain words

SCHD is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or SCHD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and SCHD returned +27.6%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or SCHD?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and SCHD charges 0.06%, so SCHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and SCHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 95% of SCHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 18% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against SCHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against SCHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-SCHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources