Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DGRW vs RDVY: how they differ
DGRW and RDVY hold 22% of their weight in the same names, and RDVY returned more over the year.
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and RDVY hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DGRW | RDVY |
|---|---|---|
| ALPHABET INC | 2.31% | 2.12% |
| NVIDIA CORP | 7.95% | 1.91% |
| APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 1.71% | 4.69% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 2.97% | 1.50% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 5.75% | 1.45% |
| APPLE INC | 3.87% | 1.44% |
| VISA INC | 1.41% | 1.82% |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP | 0.99% | 1.96% |
| CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (THE) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| LAM RESEARCH CORP | 0.90% | 4.42% |
| AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY | 0.89% | 1.82% |
| COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP | 0.84% | 1.73% |
| Only in DGRW | Only in RDVY |
|---|---|
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92% | GE VERNOVA INC 2.80% |
| COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88% | BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP (THE) 2.15% |
| HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81% | ALLSTATE CORP (THE) 2.01% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34% | TRAVELERS COMPANIES INC (THE) 2.00% |
| BROADCOM INC 2.34% | SNAP-ON INC 2.00% |
| ORACLE CORP 2.34% | CHUBB LTD (SWITZERLAND) 1.97% |
| ALPHABET INC 2.32% | JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 1.91% |
| ABBVIE INC 2.07% | SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL 1.83% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | WisdomTree | First Trust |
| What it is | U.S. Quality Dividend Growth | First Rising Dividend Achievers |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.4% | +22.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −5.1 pts | +4.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.47% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 96.7% | 94.4% |
| Holdings | 197 | 71 |
DGRW in plain words
DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.
RDVY in plain words
RDVY is an index equity fund tracking the First Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 71 positions, with the top ten at 28.6%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or RDVY?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and RDVY returned +22.0%, so RDVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or RDVY?
- DGRW charges 0.28% a year and RDVY charges 0.47%, so DGRW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DGRW and RDVY overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 94% of RDVY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 22% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against RDVY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-RDVY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources