Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or PULS?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and PULS returned +4.2%, so DGRW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, DGRW or PULS?

DGRW charges 0.28% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs PULS: how they differ

DGRW and PULS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and DGRW returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRW	Only in PULS
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%	PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%	GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%
APPLE INC 3.87%	Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%	ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%	BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%	FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%	BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%	BROADCOM INC 0.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 29, 2026.

DGRW and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	WisdomTree	PGIM
What it is	U.S. Quality Dividend Growth	PGIM Ultra Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	+12.4%	+4.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−5.1 pts	−13.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.28%	0.15%
Holdings	197	553

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or PULS?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and PULS returned +4.2%, so DGRW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or PULS?: DGRW charges 0.28% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against PULS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against PULS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-PULS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources