Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DGRW vs NOBL: how they differ
DGRW and NOBL hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and DGRW returned more over the year.
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and NOBL hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DGRW | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| CATERPILLAR INC | 1.80% | 1.61% |
| INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP | 1.59% | 1.71% |
| ABBVIE INC | 2.07% | 1.56% |
| COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) | 2.88% | 1.55% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 2.34% | 1.47% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 1.59% | 1.44% |
| PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) | 1.40% | 1.48% |
| CHEVRON CORP | 1.38% | 1.44% |
| MCDONALD'S CORP | 1.57% | 1.36% |
| WALMART INC | 0.94% | 1.31% |
| AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC | 0.71% | 1.61% |
| ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC | 0.63% | 1.34% |
| Only in DGRW | Only in NOBL |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 7.95% | Nucor Corp. 1.77% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.75% | West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 1.73% |
| APPLE INC 3.87% | Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. 1.68% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 2.97% | Franklin Resources, Inc. 1.67% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92% | Colgate-Palmolive Co. 1.62% |
| HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81% | Hormel Foods Corp. 1.61% |
| BROADCOM INC 2.34% | JM Smucker Co. (The) 1.58% |
| ORACLE CORP 2.34% | Essex Property Trust, Inc. 1.58% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | WisdomTree | ProShares |
| What it is | U.S. Quality Dividend Growth | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.4% | +9.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −5.1 pts | −8.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 96.7% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 197 | 69 |
DGRW in plain words
DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.
NOBL in plain words
NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or NOBL?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so DGRW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or NOBL?
- DGRW charges 0.28% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so DGRW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DGRW and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 100% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 18% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against NOBL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-NOBL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources