Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs MDY: how they differ

DGRW and MDY hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and MDY returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and MDY hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and MDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWMDY
RELIANCE INC0.15%0.53%
WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC0.13%0.46%
TOLL BROTHERS INC0.13%0.43%
CARLISLE COMPANIES INC0.12%0.40%
ARAMARK0.12%0.41%
DICKS SPORTING GOODS INC0.11%0.41%
MUELLER INDUSTRIES INC0.11%0.38%
STIFEL FINANCIAL CORP0.09%0.29%
SEI INVESTMENTS COMPANY0.09%0.22%
DONALDSON COMPANY INC0.09%0.29%
RYDER SYSTEM INC0.08%0.28%
OLD NATIONAL BANCORP0.08%0.25%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in MDY
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%TWILIO INC 0.86%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.85%
APPLE INC 3.87%MKS INC 0.83%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%ENTEGRIS INC 0.76%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%ATI INC 0.74%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%ILLUMINA INC 0.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

DGRW and MDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeState Street
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthS&P MidCap 400, book from IJH
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+13.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts−4.5 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.23%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%0.0%
Holdings197400

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

MDY in plain words

MDY is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or MDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and MDY returned +13.0%, so MDY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or MDY?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and MDY charges 0.23%, so MDY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and MDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 0% of MDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against MDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against MDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-MDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources