Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DGRW vs MAGS: how they differ
DGRW and MAGS hold 17% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and MAGS hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DGRW | MAGS |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 7.95% | 4.15% |
| APPLE INC | 3.87% | 4.12% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 5.75% | 3.62% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 2.97% | 3.59% |
| ALPHABET INC | 2.31% | 2.89% |
| Only in DGRW | Only in MAGS |
|---|---|
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92% | TREASURY BILL 65.41% |
| COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88% | Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% |
| HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81% | Amazon.com Inc 4.11% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34% | Tesla Inc 4.07% |
| BROADCOM INC 2.34% | |
| ORACLE CORP 2.34% | |
| ALPHABET INC 2.32% | |
| ABBVIE INC 2.07% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | WisdomTree | Roundhill |
| What it is | U.S. Quality Dividend Growth | Magnificent Seven |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.4% | +14.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −5.1 pts | −3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 96.7% | 26.5% |
| Holdings | 197 | 9 |
DGRW in plain words
DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or MAGS?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or MAGS?
- DGRW charges 0.28% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so DGRW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DGRW and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 26% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources