Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs IVV: how they differ

DGRW and IVV hold 51% of their weight in the same names, and IVV returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and IVV hold 51% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and IVV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWIVV
NVIDIA CORP7.95%7.52%
MICROSOFT CORP5.75%4.30%
APPLE INC3.87%6.59%
BROADCOM INC2.34%2.77%
ALPHABET INC2.32%2.59%
ALPHABET INC2.31%3.25%
META PLATFORMS INC2.97%1.92%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY1.53%1.47%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON2.34%0.95%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC1.71%0.89%
VISA INC1.41%0.88%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP1.59%0.88%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in IVV
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0.28%Amazon.com, Inc. 3.62%
FIRST CITIZENS BANCSHARES INC 0.19%Micron Technology, Inc. 2.02%
RELIANCE INC 0.15%Tesla, Inc. 1.84%
WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC 0.13%Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 1.47%
TOLL BROTHERS INC 0.13%Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. 1.42%
CARLISLE COMPANIES INC 0.12%JPMorgan Chase & Co. 1.36%
ARAMARK 0.12%Intel Corp. 1.02%
DICKS SPORTING GOODS INC 0.11%Sandisk Corp. 0.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

DGRW and IVV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeiShares
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthS&P 500
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%100.0%
Holdings197504

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

IVV in plain words

IVV is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or IVV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and IVV returned +17.6%, so IVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or IVV?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and IVV charges 0.03%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and IVV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 100% of IVV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 51% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against IVV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against IVV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-IVV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources