Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or IUSB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and IUSB returned −0.3%, so DGRW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, DGRW or IUSB?

DGRW charges 0.28% a year and IUSB charges 0.06%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs IUSB: how they differ

DGRW and IUSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and DGRW returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and IUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRW	Only in IUSB
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%	United States of America 0.38%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%	United States of America 0.37%
APPLE INC 3.87%	United States of America 0.37%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%	United States of America 0.37%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%	United States of America 0.36%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%	United States of America 0.36%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%	United States of America 0.36%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%	United States of America 0.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRW and IUSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	WisdomTree	iShares
What it is	U.S. Quality Dividend Growth	Core Universal USD Bond
Total return, 1 year	+12.4%	−0.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−5.1 pts	−17.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.28%	0.06%
Holdings	197	17819

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

IUSB in plain words

IUSB is a bond fund tracking the Core Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or IUSB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and IUSB returned −0.3%, so DGRW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or IUSB?: DGRW charges 0.28% a year and IUSB charges 0.06%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against IUSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against IUSB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-IUSB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources