Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs GRNY: how they differ

DGRW and GRNY hold 22% of their weight in the same names, and GRNY returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and GRNY hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and GRNY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWGRNY
NVIDIA CORP7.95%2.46%
APPLE INC3.87%2.40%
MICROSOFT CORP5.75%2.38%
BROADCOM INC2.34%2.94%
ALPHABET INC2.31%2.96%
META PLATFORMS INC2.97%2.24%
CATERPILLAR INC1.80%2.69%
CHEVRON CORP1.38%2.46%
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY0.89%2.17%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP0.84%2.33%
DEERE & COMPANY0.70%2.30%
TJX COMPANIES INC (THE)0.64%2.33%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in GRNY
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.17%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%Quanta Services Inc 3.20%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%GE Vernova Inc 3.05%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%Amazon.com Inc 3.02%
ORACLE CORP 2.34%Strategy Inc 3.01%
ALPHABET INC 2.32%Arista Networks Inc 2.88%
ABBVIE INC 2.07%Netflix Inc 2.82%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 1.71%Bank of New York Mellon Corp/T 2.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRW and GRNY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeFundstrat
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthFundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.75%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%97.0%
Holdings19740

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or GRNY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and GRNY returned +13.8%, so GRNY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or GRNY?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and GRNY charges 0.75%, so DGRW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and GRNY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 97% of GRNY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 22% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against GRNY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against GRNY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-GRNY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources