Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DGRW vs GDX: how they differ
Over the year GDX returned more, +40.2% against +12.4%, and DGRW charges 0.28% against 0.51%.
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and VanEck Gold Miners ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and GDX hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DGRW | GDX |
|---|---|---|
| NEWMONT CORP | 0.71% | 10.42% |
| ROYAL GOLD INC | 0.01% | 1.95% |
| Only in DGRW | Only in GDX |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 7.95% | Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd 10.67% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.75% | Barrick Mining Corp 7.95% |
| APPLE INC 3.87% | Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 5.61% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 2.97% | Anglogold Ashanti Plc 5.04% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92% | Franco-Nevada Corp 4.89% |
| COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88% | Kinross Gold Corp 4.40% |
| HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81% | Gold Fields Ltd 4.07% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34% | Pan American Silver Corp 2.98% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Thematic ETF |
| Issuer | WisdomTree | VanEck |
| What it is | U.S. Quality Dividend Growth | Miners and metals |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.4% | +40.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −5.1 pts | +22.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.51% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 96.7% | 11.0% |
| Holdings | 197 | 59 |
DGRW in plain words
DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.
GDX in plain words
By weight, 11% of GDX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 59 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +40.2% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 22.7 pts. It sits 16.2% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or GDX?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and GDX returned +40.2%, so GDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or GDX?
- DGRW charges 0.28% a year and GDX charges 0.51%, so DGRW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DGRW and GDX overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 11% of GDX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
- Are DGRW and GDX the same kind of fund?
- No. DGRW is an index ETF and GDX is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against GDX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-GDX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources