Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DGRW vs FNDX: how they differ
DGRW and FNDX hold 41% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and FNDX hold 41% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DGRW | FNDX |
|---|---|---|
| APPLE INC | 3.87% | 4.64% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 5.75% | 2.33% |
| ALPHABET INC | 2.31% | 2.38% |
| ALPHABET INC | 2.32% | 1.90% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 1.59% | 2.29% |
| CHEVRON CORP | 1.38% | 1.49% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC | 2.92% | 1.37% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 2.97% | 1.24% |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC | 1.15% | 0.99% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 2.34% | 0.97% |
| WALMART INC | 0.94% | 1.01% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 1.44% | 0.90% |
| Only in DGRW | Only in FNDX |
|---|---|
| SOUTHWEST AIRLINES COMPANY 0.21% | Intel Corp 2.57% |
| STIFEL FINANCIAL CORP 0.09% | Amazon.com Inc 1.86% |
| OLD NATIONAL BANCORP 0.08% | Micron Technology Inc 1.60% |
| SOUTHSTATE BANK CORP 0.08% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.41% |
| FLOWSERVE CORP 0.08% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.38% |
| FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC 0.07% | CVS Health Corp 0.91% |
| WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORP 0.07% | Citigroup Inc 0.85% |
| COMFORT SYSTEMS USA INC 0.06% | General Motors Co 0.74% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | WisdomTree | Schwab |
| What it is | U.S. Quality Dividend Growth | Fundamental U.S. Large Company |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.4% | +26.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −5.1 pts | +8.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.25% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 96.7% | 91.2% |
| Holdings | 197 | 733 |
DGRW in plain words
DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.
FNDX in plain words
FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or FNDX?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and FNDX returned +26.1%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or FNDX?
- DGRW charges 0.28% a year and FNDX charges 0.25%, so FNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DGRW and FNDX overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 91% of FNDX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 41% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against FNDX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-FNDX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources