Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or EMB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and EMB returned +2.8%, so DGRW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, DGRW or EMB?

DGRW charges 0.28% a year and EMB charges 0.39%, so DGRW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs EMB: how they differ

DGRW and EMB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and DGRW returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and EMB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRW	Only in EMB
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%	Argentina Republic Government Internatio 1.12%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%	Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.73%
APPLE INC 3.87%	Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.64%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%	Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.53%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%	Uruguay Government International Bonds 0.52%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%	EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL 0.51%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%	Republic of Poland Government Internatio 0.40%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%	UKRAINE GOVERNMENT 0.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRW and EMB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	WisdomTree	iShares
What it is	U.S. Quality Dividend Growth	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond
Total return, 1 year	+12.4%	+2.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−5.1 pts	−14.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.28%	0.39%
Holdings	197	681

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or EMB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and EMB returned +2.8%, so DGRW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or EMB?: DGRW charges 0.28% a year and EMB charges 0.39%, so DGRW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against EMB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against EMB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-EMB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources