Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DGRW vs DYNF: how they differ
DGRW and DYNF hold 46% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and DYNF hold 46% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DGRW | DYNF |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 7.95% | 8.62% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 5.75% | 5.35% |
| APPLE INC | 3.87% | 7.75% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 2.97% | 2.50% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.34% | 3.25% |
| ALPHABET INC | 2.31% | 2.87% |
| ALPHABET INC | 2.32% | 2.10% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 2.34% | 1.92% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 1.59% | 1.93% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 1.44% | 2.76% |
| APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 1.71% | 1.41% |
| CATERPILLAR INC | 1.80% | 1.28% |
| Only in DGRW | Only in DYNF |
|---|---|
| COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88% | Amazon.com Inc 4.42% |
| T-MOBILE US INC 1.48% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59% |
| CHEVRON CORP 1.38% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.38% |
| MERCK & COMPANY INC 1.18% | Tesla Inc 1.74% |
| ANALOG DEVICES INC 0.98% | Duke Energy Corp 1.63% |
| HALLIBURTON COMPANY 0.84% | Hartford Insurance Group Inc/The 1.48% |
| CUMMINS INC 0.78% | Micron Technology Inc 1.35% |
| QUALCOMM INC 0.76% | Travelers Cos Inc/The 1.35% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | WisdomTree | iShares |
| What it is | U.S. Quality Dividend Growth | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.4% | +20.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −5.1 pts | +3.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.26% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 96.7% | 98.8% |
| Holdings | 197 | 187 |
DGRW in plain words
DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or DYNF?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and DYNF returned +20.8%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or DYNF?
- DGRW charges 0.28% a year and DYNF charges 0.26%, so DYNF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DGRW and DYNF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 99% of DYNF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 46% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against DYNF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-DYNF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources