Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs DVY: how they differ

DGRW and DVY hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and DVY returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and iShares Select Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and DVY hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and DVY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWDVY
CHEVRON CORP1.38%1.38%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC1.15%1.85%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP1.59%0.99%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE)2.88%0.92%
MERCK & COMPANY INC1.18%0.87%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP1.59%0.83%
AT&T INC0.79%1.23%
MCDONALD'S CORP1.57%0.69%
GILEAD SCIENCES INC1.25%0.66%
FORD MOTOR CO0.44%1.39%
FIFTH THIRD BANCORP0.30%1.06%
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INC0.27%1.19%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in DVY
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%ALTRIA GROUP INC 2.30%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%PFIZER INC 2.22%
APPLE INC 3.87%T. ROWE PRICE GROUP INC 2.03%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC 1.85%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%ONEOK INC 1.84%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%HP INC 1.61%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%EDISON INTERNATIONAL 1.54%
BROADCOM INC 2.34%LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES NV 1.53%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRW and DVY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
DVY
iShares Select Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeiShares
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthUS dividend
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+18.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts+0.5 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.38%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%80.5%
Holdings197100

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

DVY in plain words

DVY is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 18.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or DVY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and DVY returned +18.0%, so DVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or DVY?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and DVY charges 0.38%, so DGRW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and DVY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 80% of DVY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against DVY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against DVY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-DVY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources