Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs XLK: how they differ

DFUS and XLK hold 31% of their weight in the same names, and XLK returned more over the year.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and XLK hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and XLK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSXLK
NVIDIA CORPORATION6.97%14.66%
APPLE INC.5.86%12.86%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION4.52%8.38%
BROADCOM INC.2.90%5.41%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.0.89%5.42%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.0.86%5.28%
INTEL CORPORATION0.68%3.68%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.0.54%2.59%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION0.49%3.02%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.0.47%1.49%
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.0.47%3.20%
ORACLE CORPORATION0.41%1.39%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in XLK
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.84%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.21%
ALPHABET INC. 3.31%Accenture PLC 0.43%
ALPHABET INC. 2.74%NXP Semiconductors NV 0.40%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.01%Flex Ltd 0.33%
TESLA, INC. 1.78%TE Connectivity PLC 0.33%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.30%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 1.26%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 1.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DFUS and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
XLK
State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerDimensionalState Street
What it isU.S. Equity MarketTechnology
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+39.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts+21.7 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%100.0%
Holdings223174

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

XLK in plain words

XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or XLK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or XLK?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 31% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against XLK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against XLK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-XLK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources