Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DFUS vs XLI: how they differ
DFUS and XLI hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and DFUS returned more over the year.
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and XLI hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DFUS | XLI |
|---|---|---|
| CATERPILLAR INC. | 0.63% | 8.52% |
| GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY | 0.46% | 6.77% |
| GE VERNOVA INC. | 0.45% | 5.48% |
| RTX CORPORATION | 0.36% | 4.44% |
| THE BOEING COMPANY | 0.27% | 2.96% |
| UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION | 0.24% | 2.81% |
| DEERE & COMPANY | 0.23% | 2.77% |
| UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | 0.22% | 2.55% |
| VERTIV HOLDINGS CO | 0.18% | 2.23% |
| PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION | 0.17% | 2.14% |
| QUANTA SERVICES, INC. | 0.16% | 1.88% |
| LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION | 0.16% | 1.79% |
| Only in DFUS | Only in XLI |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.97% | Eaton Corp PLC 2.87% |
| APPLE INC. 5.86% | Trane Technologies PLC 1.89% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.52% | Johnson Controls International plc 1.55% |
| AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.84% | Honeywell International Inc 1.23% |
| ALPHABET INC. 3.31% | Honeywell Aerospace Inc 1.22% |
| BROADCOM INC. 2.90% | Fedex Freight Holding Co Inc 0.28% |
| ALPHABET INC. 2.74% | Pentair PLC 0.21% |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.01% | Allegion plc 0.21% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | XLI State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Dimensional | State Street |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Market | Industrials |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.5% | +14.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | 0.0 pts | −3.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 90.2% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 2231 | 81 |
DFUS in plain words
DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.
XLI in plain words
XLI is an index equity fund tracking the Industrials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 41.4%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or XLI?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and XLI returned +14.3%, so DFUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DFUS or XLI?
- DFUS charges 0.09% a year and XLI charges 0.08%, so XLI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DFUS and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against XLI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-XLI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources