Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs XLC: how they differ

DFUS and XLC hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and DFUS returned more over the year.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and XLC hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and XLC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSXLC
ALPHABET INC.3.31%13.10%
ALPHABET INC.2.74%10.44%
META PLATFORMS, INC.2.01%19.93%
NETFLIX, INC.0.59%4.84%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.0.30%4.15%
THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY0.28%4.49%
AT&T INC.0.27%4.10%
COMCAST CORPORATION0.14%4.71%
T-MOBILE US, INC.0.14%4.16%
WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY, INC.0.09%4.67%
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.0.07%4.64%
TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC.0.06%5.26%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in XLC
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.97%
APPLE INC. 5.86%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.52%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.84%
BROADCOM INC. 2.90%
TESLA, INC. 1.78%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.30%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 1.26%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DFUS and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
XLC
State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerDimensionalState Street
What it isU.S. Equity MarketCommunication services
Total return, 1 year+17.5%−2.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts−19.5 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%100.0%
Holdings223123

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

XLC in plain words

XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 76.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or XLC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and XLC returned −2.0%, so DFUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or XLC?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so XLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against XLC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against XLC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-XLC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources