Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DFUS vs VTWO: how they differ
DFUS and VTWO hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and VTWO returned more over the year.
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and VTWO hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DFUS | VTWO |
|---|---|---|
| BLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION | 0.10% | 1.83% |
| Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 0.04% | 1.12% |
| FABRINET | 0.04% | 0.69% |
| COEUR MINING, INC. | 0.03% | 0.58% |
| NEXTPOWER INC. | 0.03% | 0.67% |
| STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. | 0.02% | 0.76% |
| TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | 0.02% | 0.52% |
| MODINE MANUFACTURING COMPANY | 0.02% | 0.43% |
| ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. | 0.02% | 0.34% |
| DYCOM INDUSTRIES, INC. | 0.02% | 0.44% |
| VISTANCE NETWORKS, INC. | 0.02% | 0.08% |
| HECLA MINING COMPANY | 0.02% | 0.33% |
| Only in DFUS | Only in VTWO |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.97% | Guardant Health Inc 0.47% |
| APPLE INC. 5.86% | Applied Digital Corp 0.33% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.52% | D-Wave Quantum Inc 0.32% |
| AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.84% | Cytokinetics Inc 0.29% |
| ALPHABET INC. 3.31% | Axsome Therapeutics Inc 0.29% |
| BROADCOM INC. 2.90% | Chart Industries Inc 0.28% |
| ALPHABET INC. 2.74% | CareTrust REIT Inc 0.27% |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.01% | Terawulf Inc 0.26% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Dimensional | Vanguard |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Market | Russell 2000 |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.5% | +21.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | 0.0 pts | +3.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 90.2% | 0.5% |
| Holdings | 2231 | 1951 |
DFUS in plain words
DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.
VTWO in plain words
VTWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1951 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or VTWO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and VTWO returned +21.4%, so VTWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DFUS or VTWO?
- DFUS charges 0.09% a year and VTWO charges 0.07%, so VTWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DFUS and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against VTWO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-VTWO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources