Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs VTV: how they differ

DFUS and VTV hold 39% of their weight in the same names, and VTV returned more over the year.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and Vanguard Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and VTV hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and VTV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSVTV
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.1.30%2.96%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.1.26%3.07%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION0.97%2.13%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.0.89%4.89%
WALMART INC.0.87%1.87%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON0.83%2.30%
INTEL CORPORATION0.68%1.05%
CATERPILLAR INC.0.63%1.84%
ABBVIE INC.0.56%1.67%
CHEVRON CORPORATION0.55%1.18%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION0.54%1.37%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.0.54%1.57%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in VTV
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.97%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 0.52%
APPLE INC. 5.86%Prologis Inc 0.47%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.52%American Tower Corp 0.29%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.84%Honeywell International Inc 0.27%
ALPHABET INC. 3.31%Honeywell Aerospace Inc 0.26%
BROADCOM INC. 2.90%Simon Property Group Inc 0.26%
ALPHABET INC. 2.74%Digital Realty Trust Inc 0.24%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.01%Public Storage 0.19%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DFUS and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
VTV
Vanguard Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerDimensionalVanguard
What it isU.S. Equity MarketUS value
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+22.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts+5.4 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%98.6%
Holdings2231308

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

VTV in plain words

VTV is an index equity fund tracking the US value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or VTV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and VTV returned +22.9%, so VTV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or VTV?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 39% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against VTV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against VTV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-VTV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources