Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs VTI: how they differ

DFUS and VTI hold 90% of their weight in the same names.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and VTI hold 90% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and VTI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSVTI
NVIDIA CORPORATION6.97%6.37%
APPLE INC.5.86%5.88%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION4.52%3.84%
AMAZON.COM, INC.3.84%3.19%
ALPHABET INC.3.31%2.90%
BROADCOM INC.2.90%2.48%
ALPHABET INC.2.74%2.29%
META PLATFORMS, INC.2.01%1.71%
TESLA, INC.1.78%1.64%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.1.30%1.25%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY1.13%1.41%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.1.26%1.12%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in VTI
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATION 0.21%Welltower Inc 0.22%
NXP Semiconductors N.V. 0.11%Prologis Inc 0.17%
SPOTIFY TECHNOLOGY S.A. 0.10%Equinix Inc 0.14%
COUPANG, INC. 0.05%Space Exploration Technologies Corp 0.14%
Carnival Corporation 0.04%American Tower Corp 0.11%
COTERRA ENERGY INC. 0.04%Honeywell International Inc 0.10%
DUPONT DE NEMOURS, INC. 0.03%Honeywell Aerospace Inc 0.10%
AMCOR PLC 0.03%Simon Property Group Inc 0.10%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DFUS and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerDimensionalVanguard
What it isU.S. Equity MarketUS total market
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%88.3%
Holdings22313531

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

VTI in plain words

VTI is an index equity fund tracking the US total market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or VTI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and VTI returned +17.2%, so DFUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or VTI?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 90% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against VTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against VTI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-VTI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources