Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs VT: how they differ

DFUS and VT hold 59% of their weight in the same names, and VT returned more over the year.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and VT hold 59% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and VT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSVT
NVIDIA CORPORATION6.97%4.22%
APPLE INC.5.86%3.53%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION4.52%2.73%
AMAZON.COM, INC.3.84%2.29%
ALPHABET INC.3.31%2.04%
BROADCOM INC.2.90%1.74%
ALPHABET INC.2.74%1.61%
META PLATFORMS, INC.2.01%1.21%
TESLA, INC.1.78%0.97%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.1.26%0.72%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.1.30%0.69%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY1.13%0.68%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in VT
AMCOR PLC 0.03%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%
VISTANCE NETWORKS, INC. 0.02%Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 0.64%
ARGAN, INC. 0.01%ASML Holding NV 0.51%
POWELL INDUSTRIES, INC. 0.01%SK hynix Inc 0.44%
KODIAK GAS SERVICES, INC. 0.01%Tencent Holdings Ltd 0.34%
MYR GROUP INC. 0.01%HSBC Holdings PLC 0.28%
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc 0.01%Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 0.27%
CENTRUS ENERGY CORP. 0.01%AstraZeneca PLC 0.26%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

DFUS and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerDimensionalVanguard
What it isU.S. Equity MarketTotal World Stock
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts+1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%55.2%
Holdings223110042

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or VT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and VT returned +18.9%, so VT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or VT?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 59% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources