Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs VNQ: how they differ

DFUS and VNQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and DFUS returned more over the year.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and VNQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and VNQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSVNQ
CBRE GROUP, INC.0.06%2.26%
JONES LANG LASALLE INCORPORATED0.02%0.80%
COSTAR GROUP, INC.0.01%0.78%
ZILLOW GROUP, INC.0.01%0.40%
COMPASS, INC0.01%0.26%
OPENDOOR TECHNOLOGIES INC.0.01%0.26%
Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.0.01%0.17%
NEWMARK GROUP, INC.0.00%0.13%
HOWARD HUGHES HOLDINGS INC.0.00%0.11%
THE ST. JOE COMPANY0.00%0.13%
ZILLOW GROUP, INC.0.00%0.11%
KENNEDY-WILSON HOLDINGS, INC.0.00%0.06%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in VNQ
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.97%Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund 14.67%
APPLE INC. 5.86%Welltower Inc 7.86%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.52%Prologis Inc 7.02%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.84%Equinix Inc 5.66%
ALPHABET INC. 3.31%American Tower Corp 4.55%
BROADCOM INC. 2.90%Digital Realty Trust Inc 3.67%
ALPHABET INC. 2.74%Simon Property Group Inc 3.54%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.01%Realty Income Corp 3.12%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

DFUS and VNQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerDimensionalVanguard
What it isU.S. Equity MarketUS real estate
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+5.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts−11.9 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.13%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%63.3%
Holdings2231146

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

VNQ in plain words

VNQ is an index equity fund tracking the US real estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 63% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 54.9%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or VNQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and VNQ returned +5.6%, so DFUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or VNQ?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and VNQ charges 0.13%, so DFUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and VNQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 63% of VNQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against VNQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against VNQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-VNQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources