Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs VLUE: how they differ

DFUS and VLUE hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and VLUE hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and VLUE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSVLUE
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.0.89%11.63%
INTEL CORPORATION0.68%9.29%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION0.54%1.88%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.0.54%4.97%
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.0.47%3.67%
MERCK & CO., INC.0.41%1.57%
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY0.38%1.12%
CITIGROUP INC.0.34%1.94%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.0.30%2.66%
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED0.29%1.80%
THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY0.28%1.09%
AT&T INC.0.27%2.53%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in VLUE
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.97%SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC. 0.62%
APPLE INC. 5.86%REALTY INCOME CORPORATION 0.36%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.52%STRATEGY INC 0.30%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.84%W.P. CAREY INC. 0.25%
ALPHABET INC. 3.31%ROYALTY PHARMA PLC 0.24%
BROADCOM INC. 2.90%VICI PROPERTIES INC. 0.20%
ALPHABET INC. 2.74%MID-AMERICA APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC. 0.13%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.01%ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. 0.12%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

DFUS and VLUE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerDimensionaliShares
What it isU.S. Equity MarketMSCI USA Value Factor
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+69.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts+51.9 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%96.9%
Holdings2231148

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

VLUE in plain words

VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or VLUE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or VLUE?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so DFUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against VLUE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against VLUE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-VLUE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources