Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs VDC: how they differ

DFUS and VDC hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and DFUS returned more over the year.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and VDC hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and VDC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSVDC
WALMART INC.0.87%14.76%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION0.68%12.04%
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY0.51%9.27%
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY0.48%8.72%
Philip Morris International Inc.0.39%4.66%
Pepsico, Inc.0.32%4.30%
Altria Group, Inc.0.18%3.91%
Mondelez International, Inc.0.12%2.69%
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY0.10%2.37%
TARGET CORPORATION0.09%2.03%
MONSTER BEVERAGE CORPORATION0.09%2.24%
THE KROGER CO.0.06%1.39%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in VDC
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.97%Primo Brands Corp 0.41%
APPLE INC. 5.86%Celsius Holdings Inc 0.29%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.52%Flowers Foods Inc 0.18%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.84%Simply Good Foods Co/The 0.13%
ALPHABET INC. 3.31%Coty Inc 0.11%
BROADCOM INC. 2.90%Edgewell Personal Care Co 0.10%
ALPHABET INC. 2.74%Utz Brands Inc 0.07%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.01%Vital Farms Inc 0.05%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

DFUS and VDC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerDimensionalVanguard
What it isU.S. Equity MarketConsumer Staples
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+4.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts−12.9 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%86.6%
Holdings2231103

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

VDC in plain words

VDC is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer Staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 65.0%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or VDC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and VDC returned +4.6%, so DFUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or VDC?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and VDC charges 0.09%, so DFUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and VDC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 87% of VDC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against VDC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against VDC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-VDC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources