Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DFUS vs VBR: how they differ
DFUS and VBR hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and DFUS returned more over the year.
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and VBR hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DFUS | VBR |
|---|---|---|
| EMCOR GROUP, INC. | 0.06% | 0.40% |
| EQT CORPORATION | 0.06% | 0.18% |
| JABIL INC. | 0.05% | 0.87% |
| FLEX LTD. | 0.05% | 0.32% |
| NRG ENERGY, INC. | 0.05% | 0.66% |
| STEEL DYNAMICS, INC. | 0.05% | 0.34% |
| ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION | 0.05% | 0.62% |
| QNITY ELECTRONICS, INC. | 0.04% | 0.37% |
| TAPESTRY, INC. | 0.04% | 0.64% |
| HUBBELL INCORPORATED | 0.04% | 0.15% |
| EXPAND ENERGY CORPORATION | 0.04% | 0.47% |
| UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION | 0.04% | 0.25% |
| Only in DFUS | Only in VBR |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.97% | Essex Property Trust Inc 0.40% |
| APPLE INC. 5.86% | DuPont de Nemours Inc 0.40% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.52% | Invitation Homes Inc 0.39% |
| AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.84% | Kimco Realty Corp 0.37% |
| ALPHABET INC. 3.31% | Annaly Capital Management Inc 0.35% |
| BROADCOM INC. 2.90% | Host Hotels & Resorts Inc 0.35% |
| ALPHABET INC. 2.74% | Fedex Freight Holding Co Inc 0.35% |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.01% | Mid-America Apartment Communities Inc 0.35% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Dimensional | Vanguard |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Market | Small-Cap Value |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.5% | +16.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | 0.0 pts | −1.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.05% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 90.2% | 30.5% |
| Holdings | 2231 | 840 |
DFUS in plain words
DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.
VBR in plain words
VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or VBR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and VBR returned +16.3%, so DFUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DFUS or VBR?
- DFUS charges 0.09% a year and VBR charges 0.05%, so VBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DFUS and VBR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 30% of VBR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against VBR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-VBR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources