Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs SCHX: how they differ

DFUS and SCHX hold 88% of their weight in the same names, and DFUS returned more over the year.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and SCHX hold 88% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and SCHX both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSSCHX
NVIDIA CORPORATION6.97%7.51%
APPLE INC.5.86%6.71%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION4.52%4.89%
AMAZON.COM, INC.3.84%3.87%
ALPHABET INC.3.31%3.24%
BROADCOM INC.2.90%3.10%
ALPHABET INC.2.74%2.58%
META PLATFORMS, INC.2.01%2.02%
TESLA, INC.1.78%1.79%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.1.30%1.27%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.1.26%1.18%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY1.13%1.28%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in SCHX
LINDE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.35%Linde PLC 0.34%
EATON CORPORATION PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.25%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.28%
SANDISK CORPORATION 0.25%Eaton Corp PLC 0.23%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMIT 0.23%Welltower Inc 0.21%
Chubb Limited 0.18%Prologis Inc 0.20%
TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC 0.16%Accenture PLC 0.17%
MEDTRONIC PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.15%Chubb Ltd 0.17%
ACCENTURE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.15%Equinix Inc 0.15%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

DFUS and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerDimensionalSchwab
What it isU.S. Equity MarketU.S. Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+16.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts−0.7 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%94.9%
Holdings2231748

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

SCHX in plain words

SCHX is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 748 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or SCHX?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and SCHX returned +16.8%, so DFUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or SCHX?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and SCHX charges 0.03%, so SCHX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and SCHX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 95% of SCHX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 88% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against SCHX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against SCHX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-SCHX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources